During patent prosecution, patent claims are to be given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification and as interpreted by a person having ordinary skill in the art. (see MPEP 2111 – Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reasonable Interpretation)(emphasis added) This article examines a recent BPAI decision which found an Examiner’s claim construction as unreasonably broad [...]
Read the full article →Relative Terminology When used appropriately, it is generally preferred that claims employ relative terminology in view of the broadening advantages that such terms provide. However, if relative terms are employed in a claim, an Applicant must be aware of potential definiteness issues (35 USC 112, Second Paragraph). More specifically, MPEP 2173.05(b) states: “the fact that claim [...]
Read the full article →